11016 History And Culture| World Assessment Answer

Answer:

This essay succinctly elucidates the consequence of two of the great wars upon the political scenario of Europe. In this particular case, the impact of World War II has been discussed. The end of the World War II had a dramatic consequence upon the political concept of Russian and German intervention. Entire Europe was strictly segregated in to two major forces- the Nazis and the Communists in Soviet Union. In the year 1941 the Soviet society was highly disrupted by Nazi invasion due to the capture of oil and gas resources in Soviet Union. The English alignment with Stalin the then autocratic leader of the Soviet Union was a positive
nag in the movement of the War.  The conflict among the countries in the War was not as simple as it would look.  Constant push of the German soldiers to the Soviet Union only worsened the War situation. As a matter of fact, it has been clearly comprehended that the basic difference between the policies of the Nazis and Stalin’s Socialist party had been the massive factor behind the conflict.  As a matter of fact, it was entirely a result of how England and other capitalist sources intervened in to the matter of these two giant forces of the World War II (Merriam, 2017).

The book details the conflicting energy of two of the giant forces.  As a matter of fact, the basic concept of the actual political scenario has been hegemonic in terms of its political dominance.   The complexity lay in the fact that the soviet union was highly supported by  the United States despite ideologically polling apart from each other.  Cornering the German forces, both the United states and England- the capitalist giant of the world had been supporting the the rise of the soviet union. However, the end of the World War experienced both the changes in terms of negating the economic and trading interest of the capitalist duo in a communist nation like the Soviet Union.  The documentary 'WWII Behind Closed Doors: Stalin, the Nazis and the West' was revealed after the fall of communism in Russia. Filmed in the year 2008, this documentary afforded to reveal the secret meeting between a communist and a capitalist force (Press, 2017).

Dealing with Katyn forest Massacre and the agreement of Churchill in this issue in order to eradicate the vicinity of the war, the documentary has attributed the close door meeting with two different polls concerning about Molotov- Ribbentrop pact also known as  Nazi- Soviet Pact. With the entire understanding of the conflict that was raised within the pact was addressed by the England and the United States. Though the treaty encompassed an agreement of non-aggression between the Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, it was immediately breached in order to get a strong hold on th oil field in the later country by the German forces (Booth & Walton, 2015).  The movie also constituted the issues such as the one of Kresy Wschodnie and the transfer of the Polish population during the war period.  As a matter of fact, an apparent historical booklet does not chronicle the datils of the pacts and political game played from hinder part of the stage. The documentary has been help ful in understanding the actual concept of the cases that was highly segregated with the actual concept which was under certain political scrutiny over the years.  The political vehemence played during the forced settlement and the transfer of the Polish populations in the other part of Europe has been touched in a detailed method. With the help of the chronicled accounting of the detailed political game played by both Stalin and Churchill has been finely covered (Hager, 2017).

As a matter of fact, it can be stated that the basic understanding of the then political conflict and the game of power among the countries has been a stimulating factor pertaining to gain a firm knowledge of actuality that was earlier unknown. Finding flaws in the documentary is an act of breaking the sensitivity of the actual concept that was covered during the course. As a matter of fact, it can be stated that the basic concept of how England dealt with Soviet Union and the Nazi Germany.

The documentary was somehow a reflection of the foreign strategies of both Churchill and Stalin. However, the video presentation looked like a thriller. Laurence Rees has been a typical writer in terms of creating a concept on the historical discourses during the Wars. However, the documentary has been quite dramatic more than being an academic one. The beginning of the documentary was somehow superficial rather than being specific in the issues. In an article published in the Telegraph it has been clearly stated that the concept of moral war and the conflict of it with Nazism have been raising questions pertaining to fundamentality (Rees, 2017).  The author’s belief of morale in the World War II has been portrayed and the one-sidedness in the depiction of the philosophy of the war was durably taken care of by the author and the director.  It has been a straightforward narration without looking deep in to the diplomacy played within.

Reference:

Booth, O., & Walton, J. (2015). The Illustrated History of World War II. Amber Books Ltd.

Hager, R. P. (2017). “The laughing third man in a fight”: Stalin's use of the wedge strategy. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 50(1), 15-27.

Merriam, R. (2017). World War 2 In Review: A Primer. Lulu Press, Inc.

Press, M. (2017). World War 2 In Review: A Primer. Lulu Press, Inc.

Rees, L. (2017). Behind Closed Doors: Stalin, Churchill and the secret history of the Second World War. Telegraph.co.uk. Retrieved 21 June 2017, from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/3563078/Behind-Closed-Doors-Stalin-Churchill-and-the-secret-history-of-the-Second-World-War.html